Very good point right here....
Sorry missred how as a now.Uh, I didn't ask a yes/no question.
I've said it before and I'll say it again I feel like Nate, KrisEddy, Tom, and Andy contain one if not both scum, I just can't 100% put my finger on who. Tom concerns me greatly because he is just the type of guy that would pull off the risky move of night killing the person most likely to make him look guilty. But Nate's arguments against him being Scum and explanations for his Day 1 actions also have me concerned.Andy sure was quick to jump back on Nate as scum, and I'm not so sure Nate is scum anymore. I'm thinking more so that Andy could be one of the scum roles and either Kris/now Eddy is the other (not pulling a vote card yet, but clearly backing Andy's play) or it's Tom still, watching idle as the heat was now taken off him.
Swanny has been quiet again to, maybe too quiet...
PIcklz, I notied day 1 you called me out as well, curious to why, I missed that last round but to date I've been pretty convinced your a fellow townie, though that has me questioning...
More of this stuff about "You'll be sorry if you vote for me". Am I off base in thinking that it comes off as suspicious at worst, and unhelpful at best? Unless there is a strategic reason to start talking along these lines which points some info at specific people, it rubs me the wrong way.In the end if I get lynched it would be good for town because they would see I am town. Or if I get knifed by scum the town would be able to see that I am town and spend some time looking at the people I was following and maybe lynch a scum.
TBQH, I'm not 100% certain he's not scum any longer, based on the way he's acting right now. I was just sure to the point that JT WAS scum, that I wasn't willing to move my vote off of him. Granted that turned out like shit for town, but what can you do.Tom, what has Nate said that would lead you to believe without a doubt that he is not scum? This inaction likely caused the no-lynch that occured which we have agreed is bad for town.
Lack of discussion and you have been figured by Townie, it is a chance for the Scum to double team you.Please direction some questions towards my way other than just accusations.
Why do (Picklz & AJ) feel that I am scum?
Good breakdown, but instead of pushing to vote, we could also look at members that have yet to actually cast a vote, scum could have the mentality of the "sit back and wait" and watch townie rip each other apart, such as in day one.More of this stuff about "You'll be sorry if you vote for me". Am I off base in thinking that it comes off as suspicious at worst, and unhelpful at best? Unless there is a strategic reason to start talking along these lines which points some info at specific people, it rubs me the wrong way.
At this point, I strongly agree with Picklz that there is one or both scum in the group of Nate, KrisEddy, Tom, and Andy (in no particular order). Josh is a wild card because he has posted so little lately. If I am wrong, then kudos to scum because they are playing it very well so far. Now, I can break that down a bit further by looking at who in that group has been pushing to lynch another in that group. The main ones being Nate vs KrisEddy. Andy has been kind of a follower, not really being the first to push for a vote. Tom has taken some jabs at Nate, but has largely laid off of Kris/Eddy.
From a strictly utilitarian standpoint, we might learn the most from lynching Nate, because if he's actually town then I think we would start to have a VERY good feel for who is scum. But... I am not quite convinced enough that Nate is scum.
So there you go, Nate. Here's your chance to give some specific arguments on why lynching you would be a bad idea. lol
I was thinking this same thing, but you went and blew it by announcing it. If we lynched nate we might have been able to glean some info on 2 days worth of votes (day 1 votes against nate and the day 2 lynch if we lynched him). But now that you've announced the plan it is highly likely that if Nate were scum, his scum partner would vote for him to avoid suspicion, and if Nate were not scum, the scum wouldn't vote for him and say "Yeah, I thought he was town, now the scum should be int he group that voted for him 2 days in a row".From a strictly utilitarian standpoint, we might learn the most from lynching Nate, because if he's actually town then I think we would start to have a VERY good feel for who is scum. But... I am not quite convinced enough that Nate is scum.
Tom, this answer doesn't adequately answer my question. You said, and I quote "That seems to be that Nate.... is one vote from a hammer. And me NOT believing Nate is a scum, I shall not vote for him. Someone else is gonna have to hammer this dude, It isn't gonna be me." Even if JT was scum why couldn't Nate and JT both be scum? Instead, you did not believe Nate was scum at all and would not vote for him, even though it would have saved us from a no-lynch day.TBQH, I'm not 100% certain he's not scum any longer, based on the way he's acting right now. I was just sure to the point that JT WAS scum, that I wasn't willing to move my vote off of him. Granted that turned out like shit for town, but what can you do.