Mafia game 5 - GAME IS ON!

[Workdawg]

You've been absent the entire day so far and that's all you have to say, Nate?

 

[concealer404]

If there are two scum who voted for a lynch day one then it is still a 33% chance.

Percentages don't change unless other variables are installed.

That didn't really have anything to do with what i said, other than missing the fun i was poking at you. :lol:

 

[Z-licious]

I copy/pasted from the front page, which was actually 2 days out of date. I had forgotten to update the front page yesterday. Here's the correct tally

Current vote count (11/29 12:21 PM)

Picklz [1] - Ben
Dan [0]
Tom [0]
Nate [0]
Andy [2] - Josh, Dan
Josh [0]
Ben [3] - Nate, Picklz, Andy

Not Voting [1] - Tom

With 7 players alive, 4 votes are needed to lynch!

Deadline to vote: 10/31, 9pm.

 

[mndsm]

Well this is a conundrum... I vote Ben- he's gone. I vote andy, Ben likely hammers him and he's gone.... What is a boy to do?

 

[concealer404]

Well, give me a warning if you're going to vote me ahead of time. I want to make predictions as to who the scum are so i can maybe say "I told you so!" after the game is over.

 

[Big Nate]

You've been absent the entire day so far and that's all you have to say, Nate?

Yes. I am not going to give any reason to fuck with me.

Every post I am making is what I am seeing. The last 30 posts are not scum hunting . I think we have a smart scum again this game. Like Picklz last game acting like they are scum hunting but really feeding misinformation.

 

[WhiteSpy9]

You had already voted for Ben and then pulled your vote.
Did you learn something that made you change your mind that you could share with me?

Well this is a conundrum... I vote Ben- he's gone. I vote andy, Ben likely hammers him and he's gone.... What is a boy to do?

This seems scummy to me.... why would you wait until you know you are going to be lynched to share your predictions?

Well, give me a warning if you're going to vote me ahead of time. I want to make predictions as to who the scum are so i can maybe say "I told you so!" after the game is over.

 

[WhiteSpy9]

@Dan Although, Josh and I have been going at it.... he has done a decent job of explaining himself to the point where I wouldn't place him at the top.
That said... I don't have a good read on anyone. Majority of town seem to be voting on/off for Ben and at this point I feel he is the most scummy... followed by either Nate (just because of lack of posts) or Josh.

Do we feel that a lynch D2 is a needed? If people want to make a case for/against that.... I could see my vote being pulled for Ben.

@Andy - So, do you think Ben is scum then? Is he more scummy than Josh, who seemed to be your previous top pick? If so, what has changed to make you think so

 

[Workdawg]

Yes. I am not going to give any reason to fuck with me.

Every post I am making is what I am seeing. The last 30 posts are not scum hunting . I think we have a smart scum again this game. Like Picklz last game acting like they are scum hunting but really feeding misinformation.

I'm becoming very suspicious of Nate.
D
oes this go along with town Nate from last game? I asked this once before, but what are people impressions of Nate's play this GAME compared to last GAME. (Last time someone noticed I made a typo and the actual question was overlooked). Did Nate hide out the entire game? I don't remember that being the case, but I was just the mod and my thoughts were skewed by knowledge of who was who (and not trying to scumhunt). Is this consistent with Nate's previous KNOWN TOWN play? I will have to review that game and see.

@Dan - snip -
Do we feel that a lynch D2 is a needed? If people want to make a case for/against that.... I could see my vote being pulled for Ben.

I think it's probably still a bad idea to no-lynch. It'll most likely leave us with 6 tomorrow (even is bad for town). We'll need all four town to vote together to get a lynch. That and the fact that we already lost a power role... we don't even know if any others exist or not. I still think a lynch here is a good idea.

If we lynch today, tomorrow it'll be lynch or lose.
If we don't lynch today, tomorrow it'll be mislynch and lose (or be saved by doc), with 4v2.

Both are bad, but I think the first is the better option.

 

[Workdawg]

Vote: Nate

 

[concealer404]

You had already voted for Ben and then pulled your vote.
Did you learn something that made you change your mind that you could share with me?



This seems scummy to me.... why would you wait until you know you are going to be lynched to share your predictions?

Picklz and Dan. Honorable mention goes to Nate.

Picklz and Dan because they both REEK of "trying too hard" to me. Nate due to lack of real participation in the discussion, which i would maybe chalk up to lack of experience in playing scum. I can see how playing scum could be hard to adjust to in terms of the discussion. There's no real point to discussion if you're scum other than to deflect suspicion. Scum are allowed to communicate through PM, so the discussion is largely useless to them in terms of moving forward.

 

[concealer404]

EDIT.

Actually, now that i typed that out, it solidified my feelings about Nate. I'm also moving Nate to the top of the scum list for me.

CHANGE VOTE: NATE

 

[WhiteSpy9]

Nate's gameplay (can we call not posting gameplay?) this game is VERY different, but I'm not sure it makes me think he is any more scum than past games.

D
oes this go along with town Nate from last game? I asked this once before, but what are people impressions of Nate's play this GAME compared to last GAME. (Last time someone noticed I made a typo and the actual question was overlooked). Did Nate hide out the entire game? I don't remember that being the case, but I was just the mod and my thoughts were skewed by knowledge of who was who (and not trying to scumhunt). Is this consistent with Nate's previous KNOWN TOWN play? I will have to review that game and see.



I think it's probably still a bad idea to no-lynch. It'll most likely leave us with 6 tomorrow (even is bad for town). We'll need all four town to vote together to get a lynch. That and the fact that we already lost a power role... we don't even know if any others exist or not. I still think a lynch here is a good idea.

If we lynch today, tomorrow it'll be lynch or lose.
If we don't lynch today, tomorrow it'll be mislynch and lose (or be saved by doc), with 4v2.

Both are bad, but I think the first is the better option.

 

[WhiteSpy9]

Good point made there. That could explain the extreme difference in gameplay for Nate. I need to noodle on that a bit more, so for the time being.......

unvote Ben

Picklz and Dan. Honorable mention goes to Nate.

Picklz and Dan because they both REEK of "trying too hard" to me. Nate due to lack of real participation in the discussion, which i would maybe chalk up to lack of experience in playing scum. I can see how playing scum could be hard to adjust to in terms of the discussion. There's no real point to discussion if you're scum other than to deflect suspicion. Scum are allowed to communicate through PM, so the discussion is largely useless to them in terms of moving forward.

 

[Picklz]

News Flash - actually TRYING is how Town wins. That said I agree (and posted this before answering your question, Dan) that Nate is playing a lot different this game than in the previous. This could be due to the fact that he was suspected as Scum the way he played before and wanted to try and avoid that, but I'm not really sold that is the case.

I do find it interesting the way Ben has reacted to some Suspicion being brought up about Nate. I'm not ready to change my vote just yet but I can't deny the lack of posts and change in game play has me at least a little suspicious.

 

[Workdawg]

- snip - Scum are allowed to communicate through PM, so the discussion is largely useless to them in terms of moving forward.

ONLY during night time... not during the day. So I'm not really sure how much difference that makes on your opinion.

 

[concealer404]

News Flash - actually TRYING is how Town wins. That said I agree (and posted this before answering your question, Dan) that Nate is playing a lot different this game than in the previous. This could be due to the fact that he was suspected as Scum the way he played before and wanted to try and avoid that, but I'm not really sold that is the case.

I do find it interesting the way Ben has reacted to some Suspicion being brought up about Nate. I'm not ready to change my vote just yet but I can't deny the lack of posts and change in game play has me at least a little suspicious.

You really need to stop twisting what i say or glossing over key words in my posts in an effort to single me out. This is exactly why i said "trying too hard." It's been a recurring theme since Day 1.

Of course you have to try. Everyone expects that, and should be doing it. But there's a fine line between trying, and trying too hard. You and Dan to me, at least, tend to stay on the "trying too hard" side of things. Nate isn't trying hard enough. Which one is more scummy? Depends on the degree, which is why i changed my vote to Nate, and i'm merely keeping an eye on you and Dan.

ONLY during night time... not during the day. So I'm not really sure how much difference that makes on your opinion.

Well, right...

 

[WhiteSpy9]

warning: bandwagon vote Nate

I agree... not posting at all is the least helpful to town.
I think we might have gotten more communication going from AJ.

Nate isn't trying hard enough. Which one is more scummy?

 

[niterydr]

By Nate math, this means that Andy has a 66.7% chance of being Scum. Do i need to change my vote?

*Not all scenarios have equal probabilities*

 

[Big Nate]

Look at this. No matter how I play I am suspect.


Well Ben is scum and my vote is set.