Search results

I'm not sure which part you don't understand... but the one odd thing is that they are written in degrees-minutes, whereas I have always seen alignment specs written in degrees with decimal fractions. So, taking the front camber (US) spec: -30' = -0°30' = -0.5° with a tolerance of +/- 0.5°, so...

But seriously I am also curious. I would suspect the different parameters are due to different saftey and performance test standards, but those numbers are so close I can't see an issue. The tolerance ranges overlap substantially so if they pegged nominal on the euro specs you'd still be...

Because it's moar negative camber which will look like this:

Sounds like scum right there. VOTE AJ

Honestly, this is why Eddy was coming off as scummy to me--it appeared as though he was trying to throw an information overload in the hopes nobody would notice some more subtle scummery.

I would be fine with longer days, given Dan's reasoning. That way if you are just legitimately busy for a couple of days people aren't all "OMG HE'S NOT POSTING DURING WORK TODAY! MUST BE SCUM LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH!"

To be fair, Tom, you did kind of a crappy job of proclaiming your innocence. Instead of putting forth evidence in your defense, you mostly relied on "Well, looks like I'm being framed, but you guys are gonna be SORRY if you lynch me cuz I'm totally town", and everyone was left with this feeling...

Sounds like the actual risk of anything happening, let alone any serious incident, is pretty low. But since the only work required to cover their asses is to have a tech smear some grease on a switch, they are just going to shotgun it.

http://www.mcmaster.com/#8644K11 Saved for future reference. 1lb for $35 To be fair though, Windo-Weld is just a 60D urethane compound... probably with some additives to improve adhesion to metal and glass. It sounds ghetto, but in principle it's probably no different than the 60D...

Link, or product name?

Picklz & Nate?

Aaaand boom goes the dynamite.

Explain this please. I go back through D1, present a string of threads along with a possible explanation, openly state that I feel there is more investigation required before any conclusions can be drawn, ask for other people's input and/or comments, and THIS is what you are choosing to label...

Did I hit close to home there?

Votes only have limited meaning until they lead to a lynch. And it would be a fairly straightforward tactic for scum to poke at each other a bit to shed any suspicion that they are working together. None of that poking has lead anywhere near a lynch yet, so I'm not willing to take that as...

hypothesis hy·poth·e·sis/hīˈpäTHəsis/ Noun: 1)A supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation. 2)A proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of its truth.

Hypothesis: Andy / AJ scum pair Evidence: They vote for Tom and JT on D1 to capitalize on the suspicion around their initial mix up, but when neither one pans out, they jump on the Nate bandwagon to attempt to rally a lynch. Now D3 they vote for each other to split the vote. Further...

I can understand your reasoning for voting that way Andy. My post was simply me reading through D1 and highlighting a narrative I saw forming. It's one way of looking at those events. I disagree that game play needs to be fast and furious. It's good to mix things up and keep people on their...

Okay, here comes an Eddy-esque wall of quotes from my first read-through of D1: Andy asks a question that scum SHOULD know from their role PMs and game rules... Nate suggests that because people are not posting much, that we should just end D1 early and let scum pick off a free townie...

*runs out to the garage* Good, my car wasn't stolen... >.>